| • |
The Mental Health Act
1987 repeals Indian Lunacy Act 1912 and Lunacy Act,
1977 (Jammu & Kashmir) and extends to whole of India.
Under this Act 1987, a “Menally ill person”
means a person who is in need of treatment by reason
of any mental disorder other than mental retardation
(Subsec. (1) of Sec. 2). |
| |
|
| • |
Psychiatric hospitals
and nursing homes can be established or run only on
obtaining a license from state or central authority
for mental health services, and would be regulated for
proper functioning and care of the mentally ill. Psychiatric
services provided from a general hospital or nursing
home would not be covered by the licensing and regulating
rules (Sec. 3-10). |
| |
|
| • |
Any person aged eighteen and above
can voluntarily get admission for impatient treatment.
In case of mior (less than 18 years of age) mentally
ill, can be present for admission by the guardian as
a voluntary patient. The medical officer in-charge,
should be satisfied about the need of inpatient treatment
(Secs. 15, 16, 17). |
| |
|
| • |
Patients admitted on voluntary
basis, if they request for discharge, are obliged to
be discharged by the medical officer in charge within
24 ours of receiving the request, provided the medical
officer is convinced that the discharge will not harm
the interest of the voluntary patient. In such case,
the medical officer would constitute a Board of two
medical officers and seek their opinion. If the Board
is of the opinion that such voluntary patient needs
further treatment in the psychiatric hospital or psychiatric
nursing home, the medical officer shall not discharge
the voluntary patient but continue his treatment for
a period not exceeding 90 days at a time (Subsec. 3
of Sec. 18). |
| |
|
| • |
Admission to psychiatric hospital
under special circumstances can also be made on request
of a relative or friend of the patient if the patient
is not in a position to express willingness for admission
as voluntary patient, provided the medical officer in
charge is satisfied that it is in the interest of the
patient to do so. This application should be accompanied
by two medical certificates (one from a medical officer
who is working in governmental service) stating that
the person has such mental illness and it requires inpatient
observation and treatment (Subsec. 1 & 2 Sec. 19). |
| |
|
| • |
No person admitted on the request
of another person can be kept in the mental hospital
for more than 90 days unless admitted under a Reception
Order (S.S.2/Sec. 19). Apart from voluntary admission,
a mentally ill person can be admitted through Reception
Order. An application for reception order may be made
by the Medical Officer in charge of a mental hospital,
by the spouse or by any other relative of the mentally
ill patient for admission to the Magistrate. The application
should be accompanied by two medical certificates from
two independent medical practitioners certifying the
need for admission for treatment, and that is in the
interest, for personal safety of the patient, or that
of others. The medical practitioners should have seen
the patient within the last ten days prior to the application.
The magistrate can pass the Reception Order or Rejection
to the application, after personally reviewing the documents
and personally examined the alleged mentally ill (unless
for reasons which he considers expedient not to personally
examine). The consideration of the application should
be made in the presence of the applicant, the allegedly
mentally ill person, and the person appointed by the
allegedly mentally ill to represent him (Sec. 22). A
Reception order is valid up to 30 days only or till
discharged (Sec. 31). |
| |
|
| • |
A mentally ill patient admitted
by relative or friend can also apply to the magistrate
for discharge (subsec. 3 of Sec. 19). |
| |
|
| • |
Detailed procedures are laid down
for being taking into custody by the police, confinement
and security of mentally ill persons or prisoners in
a mental hospital (Sec. 23, 35). |
| |
|
| • |
Detailed procedures are laid down
for ensuring proper case and custody to a mentally ill
person by his legal relatives, through the police station
(Sec. 25). |
| |
|
| • |
The Act provides for regular, through
supervision of mental hospital and nursing homes by
monthly joint inspection o three visitors designated
by the Central or State authority for health services
(Sec. 37). |
| |
|
| • |
Any person (other than a prisoner)
admitted to a psychiatric hospital who feels he has
recovered from his mental illness can apply for discharge
to the magistrate, supported by a medical certificate
from the medical officer incharge of the hospital (Sec.
43): he can be allow to take leave from the hospital
on request of his relatives or friends for a specified
period (Sec. 45). |
| |
|
| • |
Detailed procedure of safety in
hospital, or during leave or absence or transfer to
the another hospital has been laid down in Secs. 45,
46, 47. Similarly safe custody and protection of property
of the patients has been defined in Sec. 50-77. Physical
or mental cruelty of mentally ill patients if forbidden.
Similarly conduct of research on a mental patient is
forbidden, unless voluntarily consent is obtained. The
human rights of a mentally ill person are protected
under Sec. 81. Penalties and fines for contravening
the provisions of the act have been discussed. (Secs.
82-87). |
| |
|
| |
Comments |
| |
|
| |
1. The Mental Health Act is one
of the good legislations. It came into force in 1993
however it is enacted in 1987 which shows that the Act
was given low priority. |
| |
|
| |
2. Mental Health Authorities are
formed as a watchdog bodies to assure the quality of
services. Govt. and private psychiatric hospitals need
to get license from these authorities. Practicing psychiatrists
have raised objection for this because other branch
of medicine do not have similar regulatory bodies to
access the quality of care. At the same time psychiatric
hospital may be one which is providing “total
care” or general hospital may be providing specialized
psychiatric care. |
| |
|
| |
3. Role of judiciary in admission
and discharge of psychiatric patients give an impression
opf criminal flavour (Dutta 1995). |
| |
|
| |
4. There is a need of big investment
in development of infrastructure and provision of basic
facilities in mental hospital which is still largely
ignored. |
| |
|
| |
5. The Act excluded mental retardation,
dementia etc. which can not be treated. But very fact
is that these conditions need gentle mental care and
excluding may be against human rights of these patients. |
| |
|
| |
6. Power and duties of police officers
in respect to certain mentally ill persons have been
laid down in Chapter 4 part B (Sect 23), of the Act.
But we can see many mentally ill patients wandering
in public places in conditions of total neglect and
squalor. This indeed is testimony to the fact that the
way section 23 is presently put to use has failed to
achieve the objectives of the Act. |
| |
|
| |
7. “Voluntary admission”
not always real voluntary rather misused. This need
to be more specific and must have experts opinion on
the subject. |
| |
|
| |
References |
| |
|
| |
Antony JT. A Decade with the
Mental Health Act 1987. Ind J Psychiatry 2000: 42(4):
345-355. |
| |
|
| |
Dutta AB. Medicolegal problems
of psychiatrists in private practice. Journal of clinical
psychiatry 1995: 1(1) |
| |
|
| |
The Gazette of India. The Mental
Health Act 1987. Govt, of India |
| |
|